ISCRIBE MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION SAMPLE TEST SOFTWARE
In a prospective evaluation of 9 drug-information software programs for the Palm OS, LexiComp Platinum ranked highest forīreadth (percentage of questions that could be answered) and for clinical dependability (factual completeness), while ePocrates OS - one physician remarked, "ePocrates won."
ISCRIBE MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION SAMPLE TEST PC
When asked which platform won the duel - the Pocket PC or the Palm Willyard was able to find medication information more efficiently with On the Palm OS, and most attendees agreed that Dr. Willyard demonstrated ePocrates, a reference that provides information on medication dosages, interactions, and adverse reactions. While the Pocket PC provided better access to complete evidence-based clinical references such as InfoRetriever, both platforms have many useful textbooks available for quick reference, including The 5-Minute Clinical Consult, which many family physicians agree may be the most popular title for point-of-care reference.ĭr. How they would use the PDA to answer these questions. Clark then provided clinical questions based on actual clinical scenarios, and the physicians demonstrated Willyard's choice was a PDAīased on the Palm OS. Dr.Įbell's choice for the duel was a PDA based on Microsoft's Pocket PC operating system (OS). These devices now have sufficient memory to hold several medical books, yet fit comfortably in a shirt pocket. Nancy Clark, moderator for "Dueling PDAs," outlined many of the advantages to using a personal digital assistant (PDA) in Or use of computer hardware and software. Members could ask a staff of "computer-expert" family physicians for advice and instruction related to the selection, purchase, Good, the Bad and the Ugly," presented by Robert Bonakdar, MD.Īttendees also took advantage of the AAFP Computer Zoo - an area in the exhibit hall separated from vendors - where AAFP Kibbe, MD, AAFP's director of health information technology, and "Your Patients and the Internet: The Topics included "Dueling PDAs," presented by Marc Ebell, MD, Nancy Clark, MEd, and Kent Willyard MD, "HIPAA Overview - What You Need To Know," presented by David C. Sometimes the small, focused solutions can provide significant benefit without the expense or commitment of large-scale implementation.Īt the 2002 AAFP Scientific Assembly in San Diego, there were more than 20 educational sessions on using technology in family If we look at implementation of technology from this perspective, it's no surprise that we're so slow to use these tools.īut there is another way to look at technology. The results of the survey reveal the consensus of practice administrators and many physicians in group practices: clinicalĪpplications of technology are too complicated and costly. Skills and preferences of existing support staff
Time and effort to prepare the organization for EMRģ. Lack of resources to invest in information technologyĢ. If the advantages are so clear, why have physicians been so slow to implement these solutions? In a recent Medical Group ManagementĪssociation survey, several key factors were identified as barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation:ġ. Of care - potentially enhancing the quality of care delivered. Resources, such as online texts on handheld devices, can provide better access to medical information at or near the point Those who advocate the use of technology in clinical practice cite advantages such as improved legibility, data security andĬonfidentiality, charge capture, and the ability for more than one person to access a chart at the same time. Why do 90% of our Swedish counterparts use electronic medical records, while such a small minority of US physicians has made Offices for billing and scheduling, fewer than 20% use computers or handheld computing devices for clinical purposes. While nearly all United States family physicians use computers in their If "dead trees" was your answer, you are not alone. Where are your patient records? Where are your medical references?
0 kommentar(er)
